partner: be picked for dancing with stars

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents family member
Weight: 0.71
, attorney
Weight: 0.65
, manager
Weight: 0.63
, user
Weight: 0.58
Siblings law firm
Weight: 0.68
, owner
Weight: 0.67
, representative
Weight: 0.65
, employee
Weight: 0.65
, spouse
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be picked for dancing with stars 1.00
get picked on dancing with stars 0.99
be picked for dancing 0.95
get picked on dancing 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(partner, be picked for dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(partner, be picked for dancing with stars)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(partner, be picked for dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(partner, get picked on dancing with stars)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(partner, be picked for dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(partner, be picked for dancing)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(partner, be picked for dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(partner, get picked on dancing with stars)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(partner, be picked for dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(partner, be picked for dancing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(partner, be picked for dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(partner, be picked for dancing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(partner, be picked for dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(partner, get picked on dancing with stars)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(partner, be picked for dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(partner, be picked for dancing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(partner, be picked for dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(partner, get picked on dancing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(partner, be picked for dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(partner, get picked on dancing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(partner, be picked for dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(partner, get picked on dancing with stars)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(partner, be picked for dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(partner, get picked on dancing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(partner, be picked for dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(partner, get picked on dancing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(partner, be picked for dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(partner, be picked for dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(partner, be picked for dancing with stars)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(partner, be picked for dancing with stars)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(partner, be picked for dancing with stars)