partner: fight

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents family member
Weight: 0.71
, attorney
Weight: 0.65
, manager
Weight: 0.63
, user
Weight: 0.58
Siblings law firm
Weight: 0.68
, owner
Weight: 0.67
, representative
Weight: 0.65
, employee
Weight: 0.65
, spouse
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
fight 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(partner, fight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(spouse, fight)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(partner, fight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(spouse, fight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(spouse, fight)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(partner, fight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(partner, fight)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(partner, fight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(partner, fight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(partner, fight)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(partner, fight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(partner, fight)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(partner, fight) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(spouse, fight)