patient: be with pheochromocytoma

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.66
, prescription
Weight: 0.65
, other person
Weight: 0.64
Siblings transplant
Weight: 0.64
, drug addict
Weight: 0.63
, ventilator
Weight: 0.50
, alcoholic
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with pheochromocytoma 1.00
be with pheochromocytoma hyperglycemic 0.89
get hypocalcemia after thyroidectomy 0.84
be at risk for hypotension 0.80
be affected by occlusive vascular disease 0.79
undergoing distal pancreatectomy 0.79
be affected by occlusive disease 0.79
be with retinal vein occlusion 0.78
be with retinal vein occlusion monitored 0.78
be with atrial fibrillation 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(patient, be with pheochromocytoma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(patient, be with pheochromocytoma)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(patient, be with pheochromocytoma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(patient, be with pheochromocytoma hyperglycemic)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(patient, be with pheochromocytoma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(patient, be with pheochromocytoma hyperglycemic)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(patient, be with pheochromocytoma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(patient, be with pheochromocytoma hyperglycemic)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(patient, be with pheochromocytoma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(patient, be with retinal vein occlusion monitored)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(patient, be with pheochromocytoma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(patient, be with pheochromocytoma hyperglycemic)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(patient, be with pheochromocytoma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(patient, be with retinal vein occlusion monitored)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(patient, be with pheochromocytoma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(patient, be with retinal vein occlusion monitored)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(patient, be with pheochromocytoma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(patient, be with retinal vein occlusion monitored)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(patient, be with pheochromocytoma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(patient, be with pheochromocytoma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(patient, be with pheochromocytoma)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(patient, be with pheochromocytoma) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(patient, be with pheochromocytoma)