patient: be with pheochromocytoma hyperglycemic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.66
, prescription
Weight: 0.65
, other person
Weight: 0.64
Siblings transplant
Weight: 0.64
, drug addict
Weight: 0.63
, ventilator
Weight: 0.50
, alcoholic
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with pheochromocytoma hyperglycemic 1.00
be with pheochromocytoma 0.89
get hypocalcemia after thyroidectomy 0.81
be affected by occlusive vascular disease 0.81
be at risk for hypotension 0.80
be with atrial fibrillation 0.80
be affected by occlusive disease 0.79
be with acidosis 0.77
undergoing distal pancreatectomy 0.77
be with retinal vein occlusion monitored 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(patient, be with pheochromocytoma hyperglycemic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(patient, be with pheochromocytoma hyperglycemic)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(patient, be with pheochromocytoma hyperglycemic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(patient, be with pheochromocytoma)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(patient, be with pheochromocytoma hyperglycemic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(patient, be with pheochromocytoma)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(patient, be with pheochromocytoma hyperglycemic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(patient, be with retinal vein occlusion monitored)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(patient, be with pheochromocytoma hyperglycemic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(patient, be with pheochromocytoma)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(patient, be with pheochromocytoma hyperglycemic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(patient, be with pheochromocytoma)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(patient, be with pheochromocytoma hyperglycemic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(patient, be with retinal vein occlusion monitored)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(patient, be with pheochromocytoma hyperglycemic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(patient, be with retinal vein occlusion monitored)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(patient, be with pheochromocytoma hyperglycemic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(patient, be with retinal vein occlusion monitored)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(patient, be with pheochromocytoma hyperglycemic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(patient, be with pheochromocytoma hyperglycemic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(patient, be with pheochromocytoma hyperglycemic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(patient, be with pheochromocytoma hyperglycemic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(patient, be with pheochromocytoma hyperglycemic)