pattern: be in nature

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.73
, design pattern
Weight: 0.72
, theme
Weight: 0.66
, factor
Weight: 0.64
Siblings herringbone
Weight: 0.68
, rectangle
Weight: 0.66
, triangle
Weight: 0.64
, chevron
Weight: 0.64
, sequence
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in nature 1.00
be important in nature 0.96
exist in nature 0.91
be strongest shape in nature 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pattern, be in nature)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(triangle, be strongest shape in nature)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(pattern, be in nature)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(triangle, be strongest shape in nature)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(triangle, be strongest shape in nature)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(pattern, be in nature)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(pattern, be in nature)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(pattern, be in nature)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pattern, be important in nature)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(pattern, be in nature)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pattern, exist in nature)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(pattern, be in nature)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(pattern, exist in nature)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(pattern, be in nature)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(pattern, exist in nature)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(pattern, be in nature)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(pattern, exist in nature)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(pattern, be in nature)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(pattern, be in nature)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pattern, be in nature)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(pattern, be in nature)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(pattern, be in nature)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(pattern, be in nature)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(triangle, be strongest shape in nature)