pay: overtime is taxed at higher rate

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents option
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, property
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, program
Weight: 0.58
Siblings stock option
Weight: 0.33
, charge
Weight: 0.32
, cover
Weight: 0.32
, save
Weight: 0.32
, amount
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
overtime is taxed at higher rate 1.00
overtime is taxed at rate 0.98
overtime is calculated for nonexempt employee 0.84
is overtime important 0.83
overtime is calculated for employee 0.83
be in taxes 0.76
is taxes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(property, is taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(property, is taxes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(property, is taxes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(property, is taxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pay, overtime is taxed at rate)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(pay, overtime is taxed at rate)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(pay, overtime is taxed at rate)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pay, overtime is calculated for nonexempt employee)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pay, is overtime important)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pay, overtime is calculated for employee)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(pay, overtime is calculated for nonexempt employee)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(pay, is overtime important)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(pay, overtime is calculated for employee)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(pay, overtime is calculated for nonexempt employee)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(pay, is overtime important)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(pay, overtime is calculated for employee)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(pay, be in taxes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(pay, is taxes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pay, overtime is taxed at rate)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(pay, be in taxes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(pay, be in taxes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(pay, is taxes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(pay, is taxes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(pay, is overtime important)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pay, overtime is calculated for nonexempt employee)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pay, overtime is calculated for employee)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pay, be in taxes)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pay, is taxes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(property, is taxes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(pay, overtime is taxed at higher rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(property, is taxes)