pay: raises for executives

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents option
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, property
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, program
Weight: 0.58
Siblings stock option
Weight: 0.33
, charge
Weight: 0.32
, cover
Weight: 0.32
, save
Weight: 0.32
, amount
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
raises for executives 1.00
raises for top executives 0.98
raises for executives compare 0.97
raises for top executives compare 0.96
raises work at kroger 0.86
is employees 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pay, raises for executives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(pay, raises for executives)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pay, raises for executives) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(pay, raises for top executives)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pay, raises for executives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(pay, raises for executives compare)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pay, raises for executives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(pay, raises for top executives compare)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(pay, raises for executives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(pay, raises for top executives)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(pay, raises for executives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pay, raises for top executives compare)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(pay, raises for executives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pay, raises for executives compare)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pay, raises for executives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(pay, raises work at kroger)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(pay, raises for executives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(pay, raises for executives compare)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(pay, raises for executives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(pay, raises for top executives)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(pay, raises for executives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(pay, raises for top executives compare)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(pay, raises for executives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pay, raises work at kroger)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pay, raises for executives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(pay, is employees)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(pay, raises for executives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(pay, raises work at kroger)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(pay, raises for executives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(pay, raises for executives compare)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(pay, raises for executives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pay, raises work at kroger)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(pay, raises for executives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(pay, is employees)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(pay, raises for executives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(pay, is employees)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(pay, raises for executives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(pay, is employees)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(pay, raises for executives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pay, raises for top executives)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(pay, raises for executives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pay, raises for top executives compare)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(pay, raises for executives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pay, raises for executives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(pay, raises for executives)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pay, raises for executives) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pay, raises for executives)