payment: be date determined

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents card
Weight: 0.63
, contribution
Weight: 0.63
, industry
Weight: 0.59
, step
Weight: 0.59
Siblings settlement
Weight: 0.68
, rent
Weight: 0.66
, employer
Weight: 0.63
, allowance
Weight: 0.62
, fee
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be date determined 1.00
be due date determined 0.94
has time date 0.88
be due date 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(payment, be date determined)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(payment, be date determined)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(payment, be date determined)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(payment, be due date determined)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(payment, be date determined)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(payment, be due date determined)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(payment, be date determined)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(payment, has time date)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(payment, be date determined)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(payment, has time date)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(payment, be date determined)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(payment, be due date)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(payment, be date determined)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(payment, be due date)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(payment, be date determined)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(payment, be due date determined)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(payment, be date determined)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(payment, be due date determined)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(payment, be date determined)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(payment, has time date)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(payment, be date determined)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(payment, be due date)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(payment, be date determined)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(payment, has time date)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(payment, be date determined)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(payment, be due date)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(payment, be date determined)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(payment, be date determined)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(payment, be date determined)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(payment, be date determined)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(payment, be date determined)