payment: is big deal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents card
Weight: 0.63
, contribution
Weight: 0.63
, industry
Weight: 0.59
, step
Weight: 0.59
Siblings settlement
Weight: 0.68
, rent
Weight: 0.66
, employer
Weight: 0.63
, allowance
Weight: 0.62
, fee
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
is big deal 1.00
is deal 0.92
is big 0.87
be from contract sale 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(payment, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(settlement, is big deal)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(payment, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(settlement, is big)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(payment, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(settlement, is deal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(payment, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(settlement, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(settlement, is big deal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(payment, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(settlement, is deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(settlement, is deal)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(payment, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(settlement, is big) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(settlement, is big)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(payment, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(payment, is big deal)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(payment, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(payment, is deal)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(payment, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(payment, is deal)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(payment, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(payment, is deal)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(payment, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(payment, is big)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(payment, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(payment, is big)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(payment, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(payment, is big)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(payment, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(payment, be from contract sale)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(payment, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(payment, be from contract sale)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(payment, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(payment, be from contract sale)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(payment, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(payment, is big)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(payment, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(payment, is deal)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(payment, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(payment, be from contract sale)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(payment, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(payment, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(payment, is big deal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(payment, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(payment, is big deal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(payment, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(settlement, is deal)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(payment, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(settlement, is big deal)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(payment, is big deal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(settlement, is big)