peanut: be roast

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vegetable oil
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.62
, commodity
Weight: 0.60
, child
Weight: 0.59
Siblings peanut butter
Weight: 0.78
, castor oil
Weight: 0.35
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be roast 1.00
be used to cook 0.76
be at dinner 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(food, be used to cook) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(peanut, be roast)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(food, be at dinner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(peanut, be roast)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(peanut, be roast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(food, be at dinner)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(peanut, be roast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(food, be used to cook)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be roast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(food, be at dinner)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be roast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(food, be used to cook)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(food, be used to cook) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(peanut, be roast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(peanut, be roast)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(food, be at dinner) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(peanut, be roast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(peanut, be roast)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(peanut, be roast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(peanut, be roast)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(peanut, be roast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(peanut, be roast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be roast)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(peanut, be roast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(peanut, be roast)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be roast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(food, be used to cook)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(peanut, be roast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(food, be at dinner)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(peanut, be roast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(food, be used to cook)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(peanut, be roast) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(food, be at dinner)