pear: be problem in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit tree
Weight: 0.75
, flavor
Weight: 0.72
, fruit
Weight: 0.69
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.66
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pear tree
Weight: 0.42
, apple tree
Weight: 0.40
, peach tree
Weight: 0.40
, grape
Weight: 0.39
, crab apple
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem in australia 1.00
be pest in australia 0.83
is uk 0.79
be expensive in usa 0.78
be in sydney expensive 0.77
be in sydney 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pear, be problem in australia)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fruit tree, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pear, be problem in australia)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fresh fruit, be in sydney) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pear, be problem in australia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(fruit tree, is uk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, be in sydney)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(fruit tree, is uk)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, be in sydney)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(pear tree, is uk)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, is uk)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(crab apple, is uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(fruit tree, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(pear, be problem in australia)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(pear, be problem in australia)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fresh fruit, be in sydney) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(pear, be problem in australia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(crab apple, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(crab apple, is uk)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(pear tree, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(pear tree, is uk)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(apple tree, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(apple tree, is uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(pear, be problem in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pear, be pest in australia)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(pear, be pest in australia)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(pear, be pest in australia)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pear, be pest in australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(pear, be problem in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(pear, be problem in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be in sydney)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(fruit tree, is uk)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(crab apple, is uk)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(pear tree, is uk)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(apple tree, is uk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(fruit tree, is uk)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be in sydney)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(pear, be problem in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, be in sydney expensive)