pedophilia: be common among priests

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.68
, atrocity
Weight: 0.63
, mental disorder
Weight: 0.60
, evil
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.57
Siblings pornography
Weight: 0.36
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.35
, adultery
Weight: 0.34
, obsessive compulsive disorder
Weight: 0.34
, cruelty
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be common among priests 1.00
be common among catholic priests 0.96
be associated with priests 0.90
be prevalent among tptb 0.77
be more common in cities 0.76
is common 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be common among priests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(adultery, is common)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pedophilia, be common among priests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(adultery, is common) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(adultery, is common)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pedophilia, be common among priests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(pedophilia, be common among priests)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(pedophilia, be common among priests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(pedophilia, be common among catholic priests)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(pedophilia, be common among priests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be common among catholic priests)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pedophilia, be common among priests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, be common among catholic priests)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(pedophilia, be common among priests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be common among catholic priests)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pedophilia, be common among priests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(pedophilia, be common among priests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(pedophilia, be common among priests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is common)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(pedophilia, be common among priests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(pedophilia, be common among priests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be prevalent among tptb)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(pedophilia, be common among priests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be associated with priests)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(pedophilia, be common among priests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be associated with priests)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(pedophilia, be common among priests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(pedophilia, be associated with priests)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pedophilia, be common among priests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is common)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(pedophilia, be common among priests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(pedophilia, is common)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pedophilia, be common among priests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, be associated with priests)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(pedophilia, be common among priests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is common)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(pedophilia, be common among priests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be common among priests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be common among priests)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pedophilia, be common among priests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(pedophilia, be common among priests)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, be common among priests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(adultery, is common)