pelican: have big mouths

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.60
, wildlife
Weight: 0.53
, sea lion
Weight: 0.51
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.39
, heron
Weight: 0.39
, seagull
Weight: 0.38
, gull
Weight: 0.38
, blue bird
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
have big mouths 1.00
has physical part mouths 0.92
have big beaks 0.81
have large beaks 0.77
have long beaks 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pelican, have big mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(heron, have long beaks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(pelican, have big mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(heron, have long beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(heron, have long beaks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(pelican, have big mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(pelican, have big mouths)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(pelican, have big mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(pelican, has physical part mouths)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(pelican, have big mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pelican, has physical part mouths)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(pelican, have big mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(pelican, has physical part mouths)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(pelican, have big mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(pelican, has physical part mouths)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(pelican, have big mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(pelican, have big beaks)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(pelican, have big mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pelican, have big mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pelican, have big mouths)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(pelican, have big mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pelican, have big mouths)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pelican, have big mouths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(heron, have long beaks)