penetration: play work

Related concepts

Parents	factor Weight: 0.57 , service Weight: 0.52 , issue Weight: 0.50 , process Weight: 0.50
Siblings	saturation Weight: 0.32 , presence Weight: 0.32 , internet service provider Weight: 0.31 , prevalence Weight: 0.31 , depth Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
play work	1.00
work	0.87
be important in work	0.81
be with game	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(factor, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(penetration, play work)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(process, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(penetration, play work)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(issue, be with game) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(penetration, play work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(penetration, play work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(process, work)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(penetration, play work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(issue, be with game)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(penetration, play work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(factor, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(penetration, play work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(factor, work)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(penetration, play work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(issue, be with game)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(penetration, play work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(process, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(penetration, play work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(saturation, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(factor, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(penetration, play work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(penetration, play work)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(process, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(penetration, play work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(penetration, play work)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(issue, be with game) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(penetration, play work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(penetration, play work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(penetration, play work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(saturation, work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(saturation, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(penetration, play work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(penetration, play work)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(penetration, play work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Typical(penetration, work)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(penetration, play work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(penetration, work)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.42

Salient(penetration, play work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Salient(penetration, work)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.42

Remarkable(penetration, play work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(penetration, work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.42

Salient(penetration, play work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(penetration, play work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(penetration, play work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(penetration, play work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(penetration, play work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(penetration, play work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(process, work)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(penetration, play work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(issue, be with game)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(penetration, play work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(factor, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(penetration, play work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(saturation, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(penetration, play work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(process, work)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(penetration, play work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(issue, be with game)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(penetration, play work) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(factor, work)