pennsylvania: have 2 football teams

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wisconsin
Weight: 0.60
, new york
Weight: 0.59
, new york city
Weight: 0.59
, new england
Weight: 0.57
Siblings west virginia
Weight: 0.76
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.63
, indiana
Weight: 0.60
, ohio
Weight: 0.35
, connecticut
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have 2 football teams 1.00
have two football teams 0.97
have two nfl teams 0.83
be famous for basketball 0.78
have 4 seasons 0.78
be known for basketball 0.77
be in ten championship 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(wisconsin, be in ten championship)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, have 2 football teams)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(pennsylvania, have 2 football teams)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, be in ten championship)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 2 football teams)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be in ten championship)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 2 football teams)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be famous for basketball)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 2 football teams)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known for basketball)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 2 football teams)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ohio, have 4 seasons)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(wisconsin, be in ten championship)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 2 football teams)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, have 2 football teams)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(pennsylvania, have 2 football teams)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(indiana, be known for basketball)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(indiana, be known for basketball)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(pennsylvania, have 2 football teams)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(ohio, have 4 seasons)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(ohio, have 4 seasons)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(pennsylvania, have 2 football teams)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(indiana, be famous for basketball)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(indiana, be famous for basketball)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(pennsylvania, have 2 football teams)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, have 2 football teams)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(pennsylvania, have 2 football teams)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, have two football teams)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(pennsylvania, have 2 football teams)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, have two football teams)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(pennsylvania, have 2 football teams)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, have two football teams)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 2 football teams)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have two football teams)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(pennsylvania, have 2 football teams)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, have 2 football teams)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 2 football teams)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(pennsylvania, have 2 football teams)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, have 2 football teams)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 2 football teams)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(wisconsin, be in ten championship)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 2 football teams)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(indiana, be known for basketball)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 2 football teams)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(indiana, be famous for basketball)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 2 football teams)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ohio, have 4 seasons)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(pennsylvania, have 2 football teams)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(wisconsin, be in ten championship)