pennsylvania: have 20 votes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wisconsin
Weight: 0.60
, new york
Weight: 0.59
, new york city
Weight: 0.59
, new england
Weight: 0.57
Siblings west virginia
Weight: 0.76
, massachusetts
Weight: 0.63
, indiana
Weight: 0.60
, ohio
Weight: 0.35
, connecticut
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have 20 votes 1.00
have 21 electoral votes 0.91
have 20 electoral votes 0.91
vote today 0.85
have more electoral votes than new mexico 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(ohio, vote today)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(ohio, vote today)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(ohio, vote today)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, vote today)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, have 21 electoral votes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, have more electoral votes than new mexico)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, have 21 electoral votes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, vote today)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, have 21 electoral votes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 20 electoral votes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 21 electoral votes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, vote today)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, have more electoral votes than new mexico)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(pennsylvania, have more electoral votes than new mexico)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have more electoral votes than new mexico)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, vote today)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, have 20 votes)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ohio, vote today)