pepper: be bad for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tomato sauce
Weight: 0.65
, spice
Weight: 0.63
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.62
, vegetable
Weight: 0.60
, crop
Weight: 0.59
Siblings capsicum
Weight: 0.52
, black pepper
Weight: 0.39
, cumin
Weight: 0.36
, coriander
Weight: 0.36
, allspice
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for dogs 1.00
be good for dogs 0.97
be good for children 0.79
be good for 0.77
be good for babies 0.77
go bad 0.77
taste bad to people 0.75
have good 0.75
taste bad to humans 0.75
be good for young children 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pepper, be bad for dogs)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(spice, go bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pepper, be bad for dogs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pepper, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pepper, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(spice, go bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(pepper, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(pepper, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(spice, go bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(pepper, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(capsicum, be bad for dogs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(pepper, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(black pepper, be bad for dogs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(pepper, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(pepper, be bad for dogs)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(spice, go bad)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(pepper, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(pepper, be bad for dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pepper, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(capsicum, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(capsicum, be bad for dogs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pepper, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(black pepper, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(black pepper, be bad for dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pepper, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(pepper, be bad for dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(pepper, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pepper, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(pepper, be bad for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(pepper, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pepper, be bad for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(pepper, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(pepper, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(spice, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(pepper, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(capsicum, be bad for dogs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(pepper, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(black pepper, be bad for dogs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(pepper, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, be bad for dogs)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(pepper, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(spice, go bad)