pepsi: be at resturant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.66
, beverage
Weight: 0.65
, soft drink
Weight: 0.63
, product
Weight: 0.61
, company
Weight: 0.60
Siblings toyota
Weight: 0.35
, mcdonalds
Weight: 0.35
, coca cola
Weight: 0.35
, soda pop
Weight: 0.35
, diet coke
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at resturant 1.00
be at restaurant 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(beverage, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pepsi, be at resturant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(pepsi, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(beverage, be at restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(beverage, be at restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be at resturant)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(beverage, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(pepsi, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(pepsi, be at resturant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(pepsi, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(diet coke, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be at resturant)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(pepsi, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be at restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(pepsi, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(pepsi, be at resturant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(pepsi, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pepsi, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be at resturant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(pepsi, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pepsi, be at resturant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(beverage, be at restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(diet coke, be at resturant)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(diet coke, be at restaurant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(pepsi, be at resturant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(beverage, be at restaurant)