pepsi: be better than coca-cola

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents brand
Weight: 0.66
, beverage
Weight: 0.65
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.64
, soft drink
Weight: 0.63
, product
Weight: 0.61
Siblings soda pop
Weight: 0.36
, soda
Weight: 0.35
, starbucks
Weight: 0.35
, toyota
Weight: 0.35
, cola
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than coca-cola 1.00
has quality better 0.86
be better for teeth 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be better than coca-cola) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(toyota, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pepsi, be better than coca-cola) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(toyota, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(toyota, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pepsi, be better than coca-cola) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(pepsi, be better than coca-cola)

Similarity expansion

0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(pepsi, be better than coca-cola) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pepsi, has quality better)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(pepsi, be better than coca-cola) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(pepsi, be better for teeth)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(pepsi, be better than coca-cola) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be better for teeth)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pepsi, be better than coca-cola) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(pepsi, be better for teeth)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(pepsi, be better than coca-cola) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pepsi, be better than coca-cola) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(pepsi, has quality better)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(pepsi, be better than coca-cola) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(pepsi, be better for teeth)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(pepsi, be better than coca-cola) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(pepsi, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(pepsi, be better than coca-cola) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pepsi, be better than coca-cola) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be better than coca-cola)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(pepsi, be better than coca-cola) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pepsi, be better than coca-cola)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pepsi, be better than coca-cola) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(toyota, has quality better)