performance: be calculated regards to ranks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.66
, record
Weight: 0.65
, discipline
Weight: 0.64
, success
Weight: 0.64
, display
Weight: 0.63
Siblings recording
Weight: 0.64
, achievement
Weight: 0.34
, accuracy
Weight: 0.33
, consistency
Weight: 0.33
, tensile strength
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be calculated regards to ranks 1.00
be calculated 0.81
affect calculated values 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(success, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(performance, be calculated regards to ranks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(performance, be calculated regards to ranks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(success, be calculated)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated regards to ranks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(success, be calculated)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated regards to ranks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, affect calculated values)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated regards to ranks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(accuracy, be calculated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(success, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(performance, be calculated regards to ranks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(performance, be calculated regards to ranks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(performance, be calculated regards to ranks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(accuracy, be calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(accuracy, be calculated)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(performance, be calculated regards to ranks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(accuracy, affect calculated values) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(accuracy, affect calculated values)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(performance, be calculated regards to ranks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(performance, be calculated regards to ranks)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(performance, be calculated regards to ranks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(performance, be calculated)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(performance, be calculated regards to ranks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(performance, be calculated)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(performance, be calculated regards to ranks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(performance, be calculated)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(performance, be calculated regards to ranks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(performance, be calculated regards to ranks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(performance, be calculated regards to ranks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated regards to ranks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(performance, be calculated regards to ranks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(performance, be calculated regards to ranks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated regards to ranks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(success, be calculated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated regards to ranks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(accuracy, be calculated)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(performance, be calculated regards to ranks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(accuracy, affect calculated values)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(performance, be calculated regards to ranks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(success, be calculated)