perth: is dry

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents city
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.54
, town
Weight: 0.51
, country
Weight: 0.48
Siblings sydney
Weight: 0.35
, brisbane
Weight: 0.34
, adelaide
Weight: 0.34
, auckland
Weight: 0.34
, mexico city
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dry 1.00
have hot dry summers 0.83
have dry summers 0.82
is cold 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(perth, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(adelaide, is cold)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(perth, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, is cold)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(perth, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(brisbane, is cold)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(perth, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(brisbane, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(brisbane, is cold)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(perth, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(adelaide, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(adelaide, is cold)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(perth, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(mexico city, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(mexico city, is cold)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(perth, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(perth, is dry)

Similarity expansion

0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(perth, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(perth, is cold)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(perth, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(perth, have dry summers)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(perth, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(perth, have hot dry summers)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(perth, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(perth, is cold)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(perth, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(perth, is cold)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(perth, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(perth, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(perth, is dry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(perth, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(perth, is dry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(perth, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(brisbane, is cold)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(perth, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(adelaide, is cold)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(perth, is dry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(mexico city, is cold)