pet food: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.88
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.67
, product
Weight: 0.65
, dairy product
Weight: 0.64
Siblings dog food
Weight: 0.87
, fast food
Weight: 0.41
, fresh food
Weight: 0.41
, junk food
Weight: 0.41
, canned food
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
be much cheaper than food 0.81
be much cheaper than food for humans 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pet food, is expensive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dairy product, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pet food, is expensive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(product, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pet food, is expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pet food, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(product, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(dairy product, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(product, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(junk food, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(dog food, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pet food, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(dairy product, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pet food, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(product, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pet food, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pet food, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fast food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(fresh food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(fresh food, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(dog food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(dog food, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(junk food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(junk food, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(pet food, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(pet food, be much cheaper than food)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(pet food, be much cheaper than food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(pet food, be much cheaper than food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be much cheaper than food)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pet food, be much cheaper than food for humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pet food, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pet food, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(product, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(junk food, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fast food, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fresh food, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dog food, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(product, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dairy product, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(pet food, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)