pet owner: abuse pets

Property	Similarity
abuse pets	1.00
look like pets	0.83
abandon pets	0.81
spoil pets	0.78
handle pets during hurricane irma	0.78

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(pet owner, abuse pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(pet owner, look like pets)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(pet owner, abuse pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Salient(pet owner, abandon pets)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(pet owner, abuse pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(pet owner, abandon pets)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(pet owner, abuse pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(pet owner, abandon pets)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(pet owner, abuse pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(pet owner, look like pets)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(pet owner, abuse pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(pet owner, abandon pets)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(pet owner, abuse pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(pet owner, look like pets)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(pet owner, abuse pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(pet owner, spoil pets)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(pet owner, abuse pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(pet owner, spoil pets)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(pet owner, abuse pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(pet owner, spoil pets)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

Typical(pet owner, abuse pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(pet owner, handle pets during hurricane irma)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(pet owner, abuse pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(pet owner, handle pets during hurricane irma)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(pet owner, abuse pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(pet owner, handle pets during hurricane irma)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(pet owner, abuse pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(pet owner, handle pets during hurricane irma)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(pet owner, abuse pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(pet owner, spoil pets)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(pet owner, abuse pets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(pet owner, look like pets)

Parents	veterinarian Weight: 0.68 , person Weight: 0.63 , consumer Weight: 0.58 , vet Weight: 0.57
Siblings	landlord Weight: 0.34 , homeless person Weight: 0.34 , breeder Weight: 0.33 , elderly person Weight: 0.33 , one person Weight: 0.33

pet owner: abuse pets

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible