pet owner: spoil pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents veterinarian
Weight: 0.68
, person
Weight: 0.63
, consumer
Weight: 0.58
, vet
Weight: 0.57
Siblings landlord
Weight: 0.34
, homeless person
Weight: 0.34
, breeder
Weight: 0.33
, elderly person
Weight: 0.33
, one person
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
spoil pets 1.00
look like pets 0.84
abandon pets 0.84
abuse pets 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pet owner, spoil pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(pet owner, spoil pets)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(pet owner, spoil pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(pet owner, abandon pets)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pet owner, spoil pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pet owner, abandon pets)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pet owner, spoil pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(pet owner, look like pets)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pet owner, spoil pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(pet owner, abandon pets)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pet owner, spoil pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(pet owner, look like pets)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pet owner, spoil pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(pet owner, abandon pets)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(pet owner, spoil pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(pet owner, look like pets)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pet owner, spoil pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pet owner, abuse pets)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(pet owner, spoil pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(pet owner, abuse pets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pet owner, spoil pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(pet owner, abuse pets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pet owner, spoil pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pet owner, abuse pets)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pet owner, spoil pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pet owner, look like pets)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(pet owner, spoil pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pet owner, spoil pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pet owner, spoil pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(pet owner, spoil pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pet owner, spoil pets)