pet: be allowed in national parks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.67
, friend
Weight: 0.64
, creature
Weight: 0.64
Siblings hamster
Weight: 0.74
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.71
, monkey
Weight: 0.70
, snake
Weight: 0.69
, dog
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be allowed in national parks 1.00
be park 0.82
be orland park 0.82
be allowed in hotels 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pet, be allowed in national parks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(pet, be allowed in national parks)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(pet, be allowed in national parks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(pet, be park)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(pet, be allowed in national parks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pet, be orland park)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(pet, be allowed in national parks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(pet, be allowed in hotels)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pet, be allowed in national parks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(pet, be allowed in hotels)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(pet, be allowed in national parks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(pet, be allowed in hotels)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pet, be allowed in national parks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(pet, be allowed in hotels)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pet, be allowed in national parks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(pet, be park)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(pet, be allowed in national parks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(pet, be park)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pet, be allowed in national parks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(pet, be orland park)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(pet, be allowed in national parks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pet, be orland park)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pet, be allowed in national parks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(pet, be orland park)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pet, be allowed in national parks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pet, be park)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(pet, be allowed in national parks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pet, be allowed in national parks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pet, be allowed in national parks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pet, be allowed in national parks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pet, be allowed in national parks)