pet: be park

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.67
, friend
Weight: 0.64
, creature
Weight: 0.64
Siblings hamster
Weight: 0.74
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.71
, monkey
Weight: 0.70
, snake
Weight: 0.69
, dog
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be park 1.00
be orland park 1.00
be allowed in national parks 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(pet, be park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(pet, be park)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pet, be park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(pet, be orland park)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pet, be park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(pet, be orland park)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(pet, be park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pet, be orland park)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(pet, be park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(pet, be orland park)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(pet, be park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pet, be allowed in national parks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pet, be park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(pet, be allowed in national parks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(pet, be park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pet, be allowed in national parks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(pet, be park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(pet, be allowed in national parks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pet, be park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(pet, be park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(pet, be park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(pet, be park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(pet, be park)