pet: be good for us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.67
, friend
Weight: 0.64
, creature
Weight: 0.64
Siblings hamster
Weight: 0.74
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.71
, monkey
Weight: 0.70
, snake
Weight: 0.69
, dog
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for us 1.00
be important to us 0.93
be good for people 0.89
make us happy 0.89
mean to us 0.89
love us 0.87
show us 0.86
is great 0.84
trust us 0.80
know make 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(pet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(pet, be good for us)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(pet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(pet, be important to us)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(pet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(pet, be important to us)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(pet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(pet, be good for people)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(pet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(pet, be important to us)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(pet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pet, be good for people)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(pet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(pet, be good for people)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(pet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pet, be important to us)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(pet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pet, be good for people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(pet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pet, be good for us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(pet, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pet, be good for us)