petal: be useful parts of flower

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, herb
Weight: 0.53
, flavor
Weight: 0.52
, element
Weight: 0.52
Siblings sepal
Weight: 0.35
, aloe vera
Weight: 0.33
, flower arrangement
Weight: 0.33
, angelica
Weight: 0.32
, jasmine
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful parts of flower 1.00
be important to flower 0.91
be on flowers different from flowers 0.81
be on flowers different 0.81
help flowers 0.80
be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals 0.80
be to flowers 0.80
have flowers 0.80
be on flowers 0.79
be on flowers different from flowers pollinated 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(sepal, be to flowers)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(sepal, be important to flower)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(sepal, be important to flower)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(sepal, be important to flower)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(sepal, be to flowers)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(sepal, be to flowers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(petal, be useful parts of flower)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(petal, be important to flower)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(petal, be on flowers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(petal, be important to flower)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(petal, be on flowers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(petal, be on flowers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(petal, be on flowers different)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(petal, be to flowers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(petal, have flowers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(petal, be important to flower)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(petal, have flowers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(petal, be on flowers different from flowers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(petal, have flowers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(petal, be to flowers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(petal, be on flowers different)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(petal, help flowers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(petal, be to flowers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(petal, be on flowers different)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(petal, be on flowers different)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(petal, be on flowers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(petal, be on flowers different from flowers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(petal, be important to flower)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(petal, help flowers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(petal, be on flowers different from flowers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(petal, be to flowers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(petal, be on flowers different from flowers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(petal, help flowers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated by animals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(petal, help flowers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(petal, be on flowers different from flowers pollinated)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(petal, have flowers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(petal, be useful parts of flower)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(petal, be useful parts of flower)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(sepal, be to flowers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(petal, be useful parts of flower)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sepal, be important to flower)