phagocytosis: has state transport

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.62
, immune response
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.58
, function
Weight: 0.57
, mechanism
Weight: 0.52
Siblings apoptosis
Weight: 0.36
, macrophage
Weight: 0.35
, oxidative phosphorylation
Weight: 0.35
, hydrolysis
Weight: 0.35
, cellular respiration
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state transport 1.00
require transport 0.87
be example of transport 0.86
is active transport 0.84
require active transport 0.81
be example of active transport 0.81
has state gcse 0.79
use electron transport chain 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(process, require active transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, has state transport)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(process, require transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, has state transport)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(process, require transport)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(process, require active transport)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(process, require transport)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(process, require active transport)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(process, require transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(phagocytosis, has state transport)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(process, require active transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(phagocytosis, has state transport)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(phagocytosis, has state transport)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, be example of transport)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, is active transport)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(phagocytosis, be example of transport)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(phagocytosis, be example of transport)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, has state gcse)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(phagocytosis, is active transport)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(phagocytosis, is active transport)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(phagocytosis, has state gcse)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, be example of transport)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(phagocytosis, has state gcse)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, is active transport)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, has state gcse)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, has state transport)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(phagocytosis, has state transport)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(process, require transport)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(process, require active transport)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(process, require transport)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(phagocytosis, has state transport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(process, require active transport)