pharmaceuticals: be cheaper in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.48
, environment
Weight: 0.28
Siblings banking industry
Weight: 0.32
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.32
, chemicals
Weight: 0.31
, electronics
Weight: 0.31
, semiconductor
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper in canada 1.00
be expensive in canada 0.96
cost less in canada 0.93
be cheaper in usa 0.92
be cheaper in in uk 0.92
be cheaper in mexico 0.89
be more expensive in australia 0.87
be expensive in australia 0.87
be cheaper on amazon 0.87
be cheaper at walmart 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be expensive in canada)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be cheaper in usa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be cheaper at walmart)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be more expensive in australia)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be cheaper on amazon)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(electronics, be expensive in australia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(electronics, be expensive in canada)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(electronics, be expensive in canada)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(electronics, be cheaper in usa)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(electronics, be cheaper in usa)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(electronics, be more expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(electronics, be more expensive in australia)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(electronics, be cheaper at walmart)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(electronics, be cheaper at walmart)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(electronics, be cheaper on amazon)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(electronics, be cheaper on amazon)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(electronics, be expensive in australia)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(electronics, be expensive in australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in canada)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(pharmaceuticals, cost less in canada)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in canada)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(pharmaceuticals, cost less in canada)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in canada)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(pharmaceuticals, cost less in canada)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in mexico)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in mexico)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in mexico)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be expensive in canada)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, cost less in canada)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in mexico)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(electronics, be expensive in canada)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(electronics, be cheaper in usa)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(electronics, be cheaper at walmart)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(electronics, be more expensive in australia)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(electronics, be cheaper on amazon)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, be cheaper in canada)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(electronics, be expensive in australia)