pharmacy: be in vn work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shop
Weight: 0.64
, food store
Weight: 0.64
, location
Weight: 0.63
, field
Weight: 0.62
Siblings grocery store
Weight: 0.39
, convenience store
Weight: 0.37
, supermarket
Weight: 0.36
, clothing store
Weight: 0.36
, hardware store
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in vn work 1.00
use ict 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(shop, use ict) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(pharmacy, be in vn work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pharmacy, be in vn work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(shop, use ict)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pharmacy, be in vn work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(shop, use ict)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pharmacy, be in vn work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, use ict)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(shop, use ict) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pharmacy, be in vn work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(pharmacy, be in vn work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pharmacy, be in vn work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(supermarket, use ict) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(supermarket, use ict)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pharmacy, be in vn work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(pharmacy, be in vn work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(pharmacy, be in vn work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(pharmacy, be in vn work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pharmacy, be in vn work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pharmacy, be in vn work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(pharmacy, be in vn work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pharmacy, be in vn work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(shop, use ict)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pharmacy, be in vn work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(supermarket, use ict)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(pharmacy, be in vn work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(shop, use ict)