pheasant: be popular for hunting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.74
, species
Weight: 0.67
, wild animal
Weight: 0.64
, animal
Weight: 0.55
Siblings turkey
Weight: 0.38
, deer
Weight: 0.38
, goose
Weight: 0.38
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular for hunting 1.00
be popular for hunting for sport 0.95
is hunted 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pheasant, be popular for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(deer, is hunted)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(pheasant, be popular for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(deer, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(deer, is hunted)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(pheasant, be popular for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(pheasant, be popular for hunting)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(pheasant, be popular for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pheasant, be popular for hunting for sport)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(pheasant, be popular for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(pheasant, be popular for hunting for sport)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(pheasant, be popular for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(pheasant, be popular for hunting for sport)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(pheasant, be popular for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(pheasant, is hunted)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(pheasant, be popular for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(pheasant, is hunted)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(pheasant, be popular for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(pheasant, is hunted)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(pheasant, be popular for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pheasant, be popular for hunting for sport)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(pheasant, be popular for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(pheasant, is hunted)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(pheasant, be popular for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pheasant, be popular for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pheasant, be popular for hunting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(pheasant, be popular for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pheasant, be popular for hunting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pheasant, be popular for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(deer, is hunted)