pheasant: be popular for hunting for sport

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.74
, species
Weight: 0.67
, wild animal
Weight: 0.64
, animal
Weight: 0.55
Siblings turkey
Weight: 0.38
, deer
Weight: 0.38
, goose
Weight: 0.38
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular for hunting for sport 1.00
be popular for hunting 0.95
is hunted 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pheasant, be popular for hunting for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(deer, is hunted)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(pheasant, be popular for hunting for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(deer, is hunted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(deer, is hunted)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(pheasant, be popular for hunting for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(pheasant, be popular for hunting for sport)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(pheasant, be popular for hunting for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pheasant, be popular for hunting)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(pheasant, be popular for hunting for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(pheasant, be popular for hunting)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(pheasant, be popular for hunting for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(pheasant, be popular for hunting)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(pheasant, be popular for hunting for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(pheasant, is hunted)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(pheasant, be popular for hunting for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(pheasant, is hunted)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pheasant, be popular for hunting for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(pheasant, be popular for hunting)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(pheasant, be popular for hunting for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(pheasant, is hunted)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pheasant, be popular for hunting for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(pheasant, is hunted)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(pheasant, be popular for hunting for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pheasant, be popular for hunting for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pheasant, be popular for hunting for sport)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(pheasant, be popular for hunting for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pheasant, be popular for hunting for sport)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pheasant, be popular for hunting for sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(deer, is hunted)