philosopher: defend principle

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents poet
Weight: 0.69
, writer
Weight: 0.67
, man
Weight: 0.67
, figure
Weight: 0.65
, scholar
Weight: 0.64
Siblings karl marx
Weight: 0.72
, david hume
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
defend principle 1.00
defend principle of reason 0.94
defend principle of sufficient reason 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(philosopher, defend principle)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(philosopher, defend principle)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(philosopher, defend principle)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(philosopher, defend principle of reason)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(philosopher, defend principle)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(philosopher, defend principle of sufficient reason)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(philosopher, defend principle)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(philosopher, defend principle of reason)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(philosopher, defend principle)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(philosopher, defend principle of reason)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(philosopher, defend principle)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(philosopher, defend principle of sufficient reason)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(philosopher, defend principle)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(philosopher, defend principle of sufficient reason)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(philosopher, defend principle)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(philosopher, defend principle of reason)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(philosopher, defend principle)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(philosopher, defend principle of sufficient reason)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(philosopher, defend principle)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(philosopher, defend principle)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(philosopher, defend principle)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(philosopher, defend principle)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(philosopher, defend principle)