phoenix: have poor air quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.61
, band
Weight: 0.60
, team
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.58
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.34
, falcon
Weight: 0.33
, raven
Weight: 0.33
, golden eagle
Weight: 0.33
, wren
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have poor air quality 1.00
have air quality 0.92
have bad air 0.88
have air 0.85
has quality bad 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(phoenix, have poor air quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(phoenix, have poor air quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(band, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(phoenix, have poor air quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(band, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(phoenix, have poor air quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(peregrine falcon, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(phoenix, have poor air quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(phoenix, have poor air quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(phoenix, have poor air quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(peregrine falcon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(peregrine falcon, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(phoenix, have poor air quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(phoenix, have poor air quality)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(phoenix, have poor air quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(phoenix, have air quality)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(phoenix, have poor air quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(phoenix, have air)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(phoenix, have poor air quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(phoenix, have bad air)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(phoenix, have poor air quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(phoenix, have air quality)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(phoenix, have poor air quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(phoenix, have bad air)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(phoenix, have poor air quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(phoenix, have air)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(phoenix, have poor air quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(phoenix, have air quality)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(phoenix, have poor air quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(phoenix, have bad air)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(phoenix, have poor air quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(phoenix, have air)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(phoenix, have poor air quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(phoenix, have air quality)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(phoenix, have poor air quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(phoenix, have bad air)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(phoenix, have poor air quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(phoenix, have air)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(phoenix, have poor air quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(phoenix, have poor air quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(phoenix, have poor air quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(phoenix, have poor air quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(phoenix, have poor air quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(phoenix, have poor air quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(band, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(phoenix, have poor air quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(peregrine falcon, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(phoenix, have poor air quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(band, has quality bad)