phone: be harmful to environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.79
, cell phone
Weight: 0.75
, electronic device
Weight: 0.65
, personal computer
Weight: 0.62
Siblings cellular phone
Weight: 0.81
, phone book
Weight: 0.70
, blackberry
Weight: 0.68
, headset
Weight: 0.58
, thunderbolt
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harmful to environment 1.00
is unhealthy 0.76
harm people 0.75
be dangerous to humans 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mobile phone, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(phone, be harmful to environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(phone, be harmful to environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(phone, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be harmful to environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(phone, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(phone, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be harmful to environment)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(phone, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mobile phone, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(phone, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(phone, be harmful to environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(phone, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(phone, be harmful to environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(phone, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(phone, be harmful to environment)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(phone, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(phone, harm people)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(phone, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(phone, be dangerous to humans)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(phone, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(phone, harm people)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(phone, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(phone, be dangerous to humans)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(phone, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(phone, harm people)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(phone, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(phone, be dangerous to humans)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(phone, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(phone, be dangerous to humans)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(phone, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(phone, harm people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(phone, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(phone, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(phone, be harmful to environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(phone, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(phone, be harmful to environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(phone, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be harmful to environment)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(phone, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(phone, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be harmful to environment)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(phone, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans)