mobile phone: be dangerous to humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cell phone
Weight: 0.86
, telephone system
Weight: 0.74
, digital camera
Weight: 0.73
Siblings smartphone
Weight: 0.70
, android
Weight: 0.63
, headset
Weight: 0.58
, pda
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dangerous to humans 1.00
be dangerous 0.88
is dangerous 0.88
be considered dangerous 0.84
be harmful to environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cell phone, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cell phone, be dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(cell phone, be dangerous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cell phone, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be dangerous)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, is dangerous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cell phone, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cell phone, be dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(smartphone, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(smartphone, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be dangerous)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is dangerous)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(mobile phone, be dangerous)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(mobile phone, is dangerous)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(mobile phone, be harmful to environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be harmful to environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be harmful to environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be harmful to environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be dangerous)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, is dangerous)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be dangerous)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is dangerous)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be considered dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cell phone, be dangerous)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cell phone, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(smartphone, is dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cell phone, be dangerous)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(mobile phone, be dangerous to humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cell phone, is dangerous)