photographer: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journalist
Weight: 0.64
, specialist
Weight: 0.62
, professional
Weight: 0.62
, visitor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings editor
Weight: 0.62
, edward weston
Weight: 0.62
, tripod
Weight: 0.59
, todd
Weight: 0.50
, reporter
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality better 0.94
has quality worth 0.85
maintain quality 0.79
sound good 0.78
is good job 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(journalist, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(photographer, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(professional, sound good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(photographer, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(photographer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(journalist, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(photographer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(professional, sound good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(photographer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(professional, sound good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(photographer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(journalist, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(photographer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tripod, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(photographer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tripod, has quality worth)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(photographer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(editor, maintain quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(journalist, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(photographer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(photographer, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(professional, sound good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(photographer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(photographer, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(photographer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(tripod, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(tripod, has quality better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(photographer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(tripod, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(tripod, has quality worth)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(photographer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(editor, maintain quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(editor, maintain quality)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(photographer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(photographer, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(photographer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(photographer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(photographer, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(photographer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(photographer, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(photographer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(journalist, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(photographer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(professional, sound good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(photographer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(editor, maintain quality)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(photographer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tripod, has quality worth)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(photographer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tripod, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(photographer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(journalist, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(photographer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(professional, sound good)