tripod: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.60
, accessory
Weight: 0.60
, photographer
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.56
Siblings flashlight
Weight: 0.34
, compass
Weight: 0.33
, lanyard
Weight: 0.33
, projector
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality better 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tripod, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tripod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tripod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(tool, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(tripod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(tripod, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tripod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(tripod, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(tripod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(tripod, has quality better)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(tripod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tripod, has quality better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tripod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(tripod, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(tripod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(tripod, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(tripod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tripod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tripod, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tripod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tripod, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(tripod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(tripod, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tool, has quality worth)