photographer: photograph fine art nudes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents journalist
Weight: 0.64
, specialist
Weight: 0.62
, professional
Weight: 0.62
, visitor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings editor
Weight: 0.62
, edward weston
Weight: 0.62
, tripod
Weight: 0.59
, todd
Weight: 0.50
, reporter
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
photograph fine art nudes 1.00
photograph art nudes 0.98
choose photograph 0.82
develop photographs in darkroom 0.80
be used in photography 0.80
get photos 0.79
love photography 0.79
charge for prints 0.79
match names to photographs 0.79
take self portraits 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(tripod, be used in photography)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(tripod, be used in photography)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(tripod, be used in photography)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(photographer, choose photograph)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(photographer, choose photograph)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(photographer, choose photograph)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(photographer, get photos)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(photographer, develop photographs in darkroom)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(photographer, develop photographs in darkroom)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(photographer, develop photographs in darkroom)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(photographer, charge for prints)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(photographer, take self portraits)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(photographer, get photos)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(photographer, love photography)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(photographer, match names to photographs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(photographer, take self portraits)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(photographer, get photos)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(photographer, take self portraits)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(photographer, charge for prints)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(photographer, charge for prints)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(photographer, love photography)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(photographer, match names to photographs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(photographer, love photography)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(photographer, match names to photographs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(photographer, develop photographs in darkroom)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(photographer, take self portraits)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(photographer, match names to photographs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(photographer, charge for prints)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(photographer, love photography)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(photographer, choose photograph)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(photographer, get photos)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(photographer, photograph fine art nudes)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tripod, be used in photography)