photography: was developed

Related concepts

Parents	hobby Weight: 0.67 , art Weight: 0.65 , medium Weight: 0.64 , invention Weight: 0.64 , passion Weight: 0.62
Siblings	painting Weight: 0.35 , watercolor Weight: 0.35 , calligraphy Weight: 0.34 , needlework Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was developed	1.00
be developed in us	0.88
was created	0.83
was invented	0.81
was created before technology	0.79
be abstract developed	0.77
is invented	0.77
was discovered	0.76
be invented	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(art, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(photography, was developed)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(art, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(photography, was developed)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(invention, is invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(photography, was developed)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(invention, be developed in us) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(photography, was developed)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(invention, be invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(photography, was developed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(invention, be developed in us)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(invention, is invented)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(invention, be invented)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(art, was created)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(art, was invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(invention, be developed in us)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(art, was invented)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(art, was created)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(invention, is invented)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(invention, be invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(calligraphy, was invented)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(art, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(photography, was developed)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(art, was created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(photography, was developed)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.10

Plausible(invention, be developed in us) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(photography, was developed)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(invention, is invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(photography, was developed)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(invention, be invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(photography, was developed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(calligraphy, was invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(calligraphy, was invented)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(photography, was developed)

Similarity expansion

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(photography, was created)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(photography, was created)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(photography, was created)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.47

Remarkable(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(photography, was created)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(photography, was developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(photography, was developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(invention, be developed in us)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(invention, is invented)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(invention, be invented)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(art, was created)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(art, was invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(calligraphy, was invented)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(invention, be developed in us)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(art, was created)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(invention, is invented)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(invention, be invented)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(photography, was developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(art, was invented)