picking: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.52
, operation
Weight: 0.46
, duty
Weight: 0.45
, function
Weight: 0.43
, berry
Weight: 0.43
Siblings finding
Weight: 0.31
, rubbing
Weight: 0.30
, cracking
Weight: 0.30
, wound
Weight: 0.30
, good
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
feel good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(picking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(picking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(rubbing, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(picking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(cracking, feel good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(picking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rubbing, feel good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(picking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(rubbing, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(rubbing, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(picking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cracking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(cracking, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(picking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(cracking, feel good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(cracking, feel good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(picking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(rubbing, feel good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(rubbing, feel good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(picking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(picking, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(picking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(picking, feel good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(picking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(picking, feel good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(picking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(picking, feel good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(picking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(picking, feel good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(picking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(picking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(picking, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(picking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(picking, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(picking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cracking, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(picking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cracking, feel good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(picking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(rubbing, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(picking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(rubbing, feel good)