pie: have cool

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents apple pie
Weight: 0.75
, dish
Weight: 0.66
, dessert
Weight: 0.65
, item
Weight: 0.57
, junk food
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chocolate cake
Weight: 0.37
, meat pie
Weight: 0.37
, cheesecake
Weight: 0.36
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.36
, tiramisu
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have cool 1.00
is cool 0.98
need cool 0.95
cool for long 0.92
get hot 0.78
is warm 0.76
is hot 0.76
come out too dry 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(apple pie, need cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pie, have cool)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pie, have cool)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(dessert, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pie, have cool)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(dessert, get hot)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(apple pie, need cool)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(dessert, is hot)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(apple pie, need cool)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dessert, get hot)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is hot)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cheesecake, cool for long)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(apple pie, need cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(pie, have cool)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(pie, have cool)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(dessert, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(pie, have cool)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cheesecake, cool for long) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cheesecake, cool for long)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(pie, have cool)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pie, is cool)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(pie, need cool)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(pie, need cool)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(pie, need cool)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(pie, come out too dry)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(pie, come out too dry)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(pie, is cool)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(pie, come out too dry)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pie, need cool)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(pie, is cool)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(pie, is cool)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(pie, come out too dry)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(pie, is warm)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(pie, is warm)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(pie, is warm)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(pie, is warm)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pie, have cool)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pie, have cool)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(apple pie, need cool)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(dessert, get hot)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(dessert, is hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cheesecake, cool for long)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(apple pie, need cool)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(dessert, get hot)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(pie, have cool) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(dessert, is hot)