pie: need cool

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents apple pie
Weight: 0.75
, dish
Weight: 0.66
, dessert
Weight: 0.65
, item
Weight: 0.57
, junk food
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chocolate cake
Weight: 0.37
, meat pie
Weight: 0.37
, cheesecake
Weight: 0.36
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.36
, tiramisu
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
need cool 1.00
have cool 0.95
is cool 0.94
cool for long 0.89
get hot 0.78
come out too dry 0.76
CAN can good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(apple pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(pie, need cool)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(junk food, CAN can good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(pie, need cool)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(dessert, get hot)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(pie, need cool)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(dessert, get hot)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(apple pie, need cool)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(junk food, CAN can good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(apple pie, need cool)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dessert, get hot)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(junk food, CAN can good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cheesecake, cool for long)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(apple pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(pie, need cool)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(junk food, CAN can good)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(pie, need cool)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(dessert, get hot)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(pie, need cool)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cheesecake, cool for long)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cheesecake, cool for long)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(pie, need cool)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(pie, come out too dry)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(pie, come out too dry)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(pie, come out too dry)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(pie, is cool)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(pie, have cool)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pie, need cool)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(pie, need cool)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(apple pie, need cool)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(dessert, get hot)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(junk food, CAN can good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cheesecake, cool for long)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(apple pie, need cool)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(dessert, get hot)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(pie, need cool)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(junk food, CAN can good)