pie: is inferior choice

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents apple pie
Weight: 0.75
, dish
Weight: 0.66
, dessert
Weight: 0.65
, item
Weight: 0.57
, junk food
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chocolate cake
Weight: 0.37
, meat pie
Weight: 0.37
, cheesecake
Weight: 0.36
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.36
, tiramisu
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is inferior choice 1.00
has quality disadvantage 0.77
has quality better 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(junk food, has quality disadvantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(pie, is inferior choice)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(pie, is inferior choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(junk food, has quality disadvantage)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pie, is inferior choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(junk food, has quality disadvantage)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pie, is inferior choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(junk food, has quality disadvantage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(pie, is inferior choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(pie, is inferior choice)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(pie, is inferior choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(pie, is inferior choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(pie, is inferior choice)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(pie, is inferior choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(pie, is inferior choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pie, is inferior choice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(pie, is inferior choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(pie, is inferior choice)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pie, is inferior choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality disadvantage)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pie, is inferior choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tiramisu, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(pie, is inferior choice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(junk food, has quality disadvantage)