pike: be at fresh water lake

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents predator
Weight: 0.58
, fish
Weight: 0.56
, county
Weight: 0.51
, man
Weight: 0.48
, dish
Weight: 0.48
Siblings trout
Weight: 0.34
, chinook salmon
Weight: 0.34
, catfish
Weight: 0.34
, herring
Weight: 0.34
, flounder
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at fresh water lake 1.00
be at fresh water lake and river 0.98
be at cold water lake 0.93
be at in lake 0.92
be at lake 0.92
fish in lake 0.90
be at lake river and ocean 0.90
requires go to lake 0.89
be at water 0.89
be at in water 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fish, be at in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pike, be at fresh water lake)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fish, requires go to lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pike, be at fresh water lake)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pike, be at fresh water lake)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(fish, be at in lake)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(fish, requires go to lake)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(fish, be at in water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at in lake)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(fish, requires go to lake)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at in water)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(trout, be at water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(catfish, be at water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fish, be at in lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(pike, be at fresh water lake)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fish, requires go to lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(pike, be at fresh water lake)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(fish, be at in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(pike, be at fresh water lake)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(trout, be at water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(trout, be at water)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(catfish, be at water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(catfish, be at water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(pike, be at fresh water lake)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(pike, be at fresh water lake and river)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(pike, be at cold water lake)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(pike, be at lake)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(pike, be at cold water lake)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(pike, be at cold water lake)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pike, be at fresh water lake)

Typical implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pike, be at fresh water lake)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(fish, be at in water)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fish, requires go to lake)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fish, be at in lake)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(catfish, be at water)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(trout, be at water)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(fish, be at in water)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fish, be at in lake)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(pike, be at fresh water lake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fish, requires go to lake)