pike: have bad rep

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.68
, predator
Weight: 0.58
, fish
Weight: 0.56
, county
Weight: 0.51
, man
Weight: 0.48
Siblings steelhead trout
Weight: 0.37
, rainbow trout
Weight: 0.36
, trout
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bad rep 1.00
have rep 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pike, have bad rep) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(pike, have bad rep)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(pike, have bad rep) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(pike, have rep)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pike, have bad rep) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(pike, have rep)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(pike, have bad rep) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(pike, have rep)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(pike, have bad rep) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(pike, have rep)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(pike, have bad rep) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pike, have bad rep) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(pike, have bad rep)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(pike, have bad rep) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pike, have bad rep)