pike: have slime

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.68
, predator
Weight: 0.58
, fish
Weight: 0.56
, county
Weight: 0.51
, man
Weight: 0.48
Siblings steelhead trout
Weight: 0.37
, rainbow trout
Weight: 0.36
, trout
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have slime 1.00
is slimy 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pike, have slime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(trout, is slimy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pike, have slime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(trout, is slimy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(trout, is slimy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pike, have slime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(pike, have slime)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(pike, have slime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pike, is slimy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(pike, have slime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(pike, is slimy)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pike, have slime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(pike, is slimy)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(pike, have slime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(pike, is slimy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(pike, have slime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(pike, have slime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pike, have slime)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(pike, have slime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(pike, have slime)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pike, have slime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(trout, is slimy)