:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pike, is slimy)
⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(trout, is slimy)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(pike, is slimy)
⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(pike, is slimy)
Similarity expansion
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(pike, is slimy)
⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(pike, have slime)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(pike, is slimy)
⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(pike, have slime)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(pike, is slimy)
⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(pike, have slime)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(pike, is slimy)
⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pike, have slime)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(pike, is slimy)
⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(pike, is slimy)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pike, is slimy)
⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(trout, is slimy)