pilot: need maths

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents worker
Weight: 0.63
, episode
Weight: 0.58
, program
Weight: 0.58
, passenger
Weight: 0.58
Siblings construction worker
Weight: 0.34
, nurse
Weight: 0.33
, nikita
Weight: 0.33
, bus driver
Weight: 0.33
, office worker
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
need maths 1.00
need math 0.86
use trigonometry 0.76
need physics 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pilot, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need maths)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pilot, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need math)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pilot, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(construction worker, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(construction worker, need maths)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pilot, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(construction worker, need math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(construction worker, need math)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pilot, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(pilot, need maths)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(pilot, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(pilot, need physics)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pilot, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(pilot, need physics)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(pilot, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(pilot, need physics)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(pilot, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pilot, need physics)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(pilot, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(pilot, use trigonometry)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(pilot, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pilot, use trigonometry)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pilot, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(pilot, use trigonometry)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(pilot, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(pilot, use trigonometry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(pilot, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(pilot, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pilot, need maths)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pilot, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(pilot, need maths)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pilot, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(construction worker, need maths)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pilot, need maths) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(construction worker, need math)